An Inequality in Determinants
Leo Giugiuc posted the following elegant problem at the CutTheKnotMath facebook page. The problem is due to Dan Sitaru, Solution 2 to Leo Giugiuc.
Assume $1\lt 2a\lt 2b\lt 2c.$ Prove or disprove that
$\left|\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 1 & 1\\ a & b & c\\ a^4 & b^4 & c^4\\ \end{array}\right|\ge \left|\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 1 & 1\\ a & b & c\\ a^3 & b^3 & c^3. \end{array}\right|.$
Solution 1
The problem reduces to evaluating the determinant:
$D=\left|\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 1 & 1\\ a & b & c\\ a^4-a^3 & b^4-b^3 & c^4-c^3\\ \end{array}\right|.$
By subtracting the first row - suitably multiplied - from the second and the third, we arrive at an equal determinant
$D=\left|\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 1 & 1\\ 0 & b-a & c-a\\ 0 & (b^4-b^3)-(a^4-a^3) & (c^4-c^3)-(a^4-a^3)\\ \end{array}\right|=\left|\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 1 & 1\\ 0 & b-a & c-a\\ 0 & (b-a)B & (c-a)C\\ \end{array}\right|,$
where
$B=b^3+b^2a+ba^2+a^3-b^2-ab-a^2,\\ C=c^3+c^2a+ca^2+a^3-c^2-ac-a^2.$
Now, subtracting the second row multiplied by $B$ from the third one we again get an equal determinant:
$D=\left|\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 1 & 1\\ 0 & b-a & c-a\\ 0 & 0 & (c-a)(C-B)\\ \end{array}\right|=(b-a)(c-a)(C-B).$
We find that $C-B=(c-b)X,$ where
$\displaystyle\begin{align} X&=c^2+cb+b^2+ca+ba+a^2-c-c-a\\ &=\left(a-\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}+\left(b-\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}+\left(c-\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}+ab+bc+ca-\frac{3}{4}. \end{align}$
The squares are non-negative which may suggest that the same is true of the whole expression. This is indeed so because, by the AM-GM inequality,
$\displaystyle\frac{1}{3}(ab+bc+ca)\ge\sqrt[3]{a^2b^2c^2}\ge\sqrt[3]{2^{-6}}=\frac{1}{4}.$
The equality could be attained only when $\displaystyle a=b=c=\frac{1}{2}$ which never happens due to $a\lt b\lt c.$ It follows that $D$ equals $(b-a)(c-a)(c-b)$ times a positive expression and is, thus, itself positive.
Solution 2
Let $\displaystyle f:\left(\frac{1}{2},\infty\right)\leftarrow\mathbb{R}$ defined by $f(x)=x^4-x^3.$ It is easily seen that $f''(x)=6x(2x-1)\gt 0,$ for $\displaystyle x\gt\frac{1}{2}.$ On the other hand, the difference of the two determinants, $\Delta_1$ and and $\Delta_2$ can be written as
$\Delta_1-\Delta_2=\left|\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 1 & 1\\ a & b & c\\ f(a) & f(b) & f(c)\\ \end{array}\right|=\left|\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 0\\ a & b-a & c-b\\ f(a) & f(b)-f(a) & f(c)-f(b) \end{array}\right|.$
By the Mean Value Theorem, $f(b)-f(a)=f'(u)(b-a)$ and $f(c)-f(b)=f'(v)(c-b),$ where $a\lt u\lt b\lt v\lt c.$ It follows that
$\Delta_1-\Delta_2==(b-a)(c-b)(f'(v)-f'(u))\gt 0,$
because $f'$ is strictly increasing on $\displaystyle\left(\frac{1}{2},\infty\right).$
- An Inequality for Grade 8
- An Extension of the AM-GM Inequality
- Schur's Inequality
- Newton's and Maclaurin's Inequalities
- Rearrangement Inequality
- Chebyshev Inequality
- A Mathematical Rabbit out of an Algebraic Hat
- An Inequality With an Infinite Series
- An Inequality: 1/2 * 3/4 * 5/6 * ... * 99/100 less than 1/10
- A Low Bound for 1/2 * 3/4 * 5/6 * ... * (2n-1)/2n
- An Inequality: Easier to prove a subtler inequality
- Inequality with Logarithms
- An inequality: 1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + ... less than 2
- Inequality with Harmonic Differences
- An Inequality by Uncommon Induction
- From Triangle Inequality to Inequality in Triangle
- Area Inequality in Triangle II
- An Inequality in Triangle
- Hlawka's Inequality
- An Application of Hlawka's Inequality
- An Inequality in Determinants
- An Application of Schur's Inequality
- An Inequality from Tibet
- Application of Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality
- Area Inequalities in Triangle
- An Inequality from Tibet
- An Inequality with Constraint
- An Inequality with Constraints II
|Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Algebra| |Store|
Copyright © 1996-2015 Alexander Bogomolny
| 49555020 |

