Go back to previous page
Forum URL: http://www.cut-the-knot.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/forumctk.cgi
Forum Name: College math
Topic ID: 45
Message ID: 0
#0, Advice for self study text, and a question re mirror-sym. hyper-space objects
Posted by dseidman on Jan-05-01 at 01:56 PM
Dear Sir:

My mathematical education stopped some 20 years ago with college calculus. Now, as an intellectually curious adult, I am painfuly aware that advanced mathematics is a language that I must become fluent in. Do you have any text recommendations to help me bring myself up to speed?

I am most interested in mastering nonlinear algebraics. (I am a physician with a strong interest in the neurosciences and the current best model of brain function is, IMHO, Steve Grossberg's Adaptive Resonance Theory, which relies on nonlinear algebraics.)

I am also interested in gaining a better mastery of the manipulation of objects of greater than 4 dimensions and their mirror-symmetric partners. Your site on the hyper-cube (tesseract) was useful, but clearly not enough in itself. This is needed to allow me to answer a question of great curiousity to me, relevant to modern physics.

This specific question impacts how to understand matter/antimatter: Modern physicists believe that we live in a matter predominate universe because of subtle differences between matter and antimatter (favoring the survival of matter), but offer no fundamental reason why they should be different. An alternative explanation is that matter and antimatter particles (strings, what-have-you) ARE present in equal amounts, but that are oriented differently in greater than 4D space ... such that matter and antimatter have a limitted intersection of many-dimensioned space where they have significant interactionability. This would result, I think, in sets that are equal in number and truely mirror symmetric, but not appearing to be so. Obviously, the human mind cannot visualize such a space, except mathematically. I'd like to model this out, but don't know where to begin. Can you help me?

Thank you,

Don Seidman