#0, induction and function
Posted by matemusic on Jul-30-02 at 08:32 AM
Hi, here's a "little" problem i found in a book about induction : Let's f a function from the naturals integers N to N that satisfy: * f(1) > 0 * f(m² + n²) = (f(m))² + (f(n))² I've calculate f(m) for m = 0 to 20 and find f(m) = m for all these values, but how can we give a good induction proof of this fact, i don't know ? ... Could someone help me, please ! ... Apologize for my poor english . Thanks Best regards
#1, RE: induction and function
Posted by alexb on Jul-30-02 at 08:38 AM
In response to message #0
Try simple cases. What do you get plugging in m = n = 0? What do you get if only one of them is 0?
#2, RE: induction and function
Posted by matemusic on Aug-01-02 at 07:52 AM
In response to message #1
>Try simple cases. What do you get plugging in m = n = >0? What do you get if only one of them is 0? Of course it'easy to prove that f(0)=0 and f(n²)=(f(n))², even it'rather easy to calculate f(1),f(2), then f(4),f(8) , then f(5) (plug m=2,n=1), then f(3) (plug m=3,n=4) ,etc... In fact i have calculate f(m) for m=0 to 20 and i stop to 20 because I wanted a general proof of the "obvious" fact that f(m) = m by induction, but it does'nt seem to be quite so easy Thanks a lot if you could help me sincerely
#3, RE: induction and function
Posted by sanjay on Aug-18-02 at 12:07 PM
In response to message #0
Induction generally can only be used on integer arguments because the proof depends on a process that hits every number. Keeping this in mind, here is a general guideline that should assist you in solving the induction problem above:Firstly, make sure you know where you are starting from. It is usually a good idea to include both 0 and 1 in the base cases. (They can be calculated by hand and then assumed in the rest of the induction.) f(0) = 0 f(1) = 1 In induction, we assume that we have already proved that f(m) = m for all values of m <= k, and then we prove that f(k+1) = k+1. This should help you get started on your inductive proof. Sanjay Sanjay
#4, RE: induction and function
Posted by Michael Klipper on Aug-19-02 at 06:42 AM
In response to message #3
One thing that might be useful to know is that the summation property of this function does not have to be restricted to two terms. For example, f(a^2 + b^2 + c^2) = (f(a))^2 + (f(b))^2 + (f(c))^2, which is easily proven through iteration of the sum property.The reason why this property is useful is that, although not every number is a sum of two perfect squares, every number must be a sum of some finite number of perfect squares (at worst, n is the sum of n ones).
|