Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Try our no ads browsing

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Tutor Match Tutoring and Homework Help

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Try our no ads browsing Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Infinitude of Primes
Via Fermat Numbers

The Fermat numbers form a sequence in the form Fn = 22n + 1, n = 0, 1, 2, ... Clearly all the Fermat numbers are odd. Moreover, as we'll see shortly, any two are mutually prime. In other words, each has a prime factor not shared by any other. Hence, the number of primes cannot be finite.

That no two Fermat numbers have a non-trivial common factor follows from the two lemmas below.

Lemma 1

(1) F0·F1·F2·...·Fn-1 = Fn - 2, n ≥ 1.

Proof

The proof is by induction. Since F0 = 3 and F1 = 5, (1) is indeed true for k = 1. Assume it holds for k = n. For k = n+1,

 
F0·F1·F2·...·Fn= (F0·F1·F2·...·Fn-1)·Fn
 = (Fn - 2)·Fn
 = (22n - 1)(22n + 1)
 = 22n+1 - 1
 = Fn+1 - 2.

Lemma 2

(1) For n ≠ m, Fn and Fm are mutually prime.

Proof

Indeed, assume t divides both Fn and Fm, m < n. By Lemma 1,

  Fn = F0·F1·...·Fm·...·Fn-1 - 2,

implying that t divides

  F0·F1·...·Fm·...·Fn-1 - Fn = 2.

But 2 has only two factors: 1 and 2. Being odd, Fermat numbers are not divisible by 2. Hence t = 1, which proves the lemma.

Reference

  1. M. Aigner, G. Ziegler, Proofs from THE BOOK, Springer, 2000
  2. G. H. Hardy and E. M. Wright, An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, Fifth Edition, Oxford Science Publications, 1996.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

30746394Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:



Latest on CTK Exchange
try this puzzle ?/?? + ?/?? + ?/? ...
Posted by albert1950
5 messages
12:40 PM, Nov-18-08

Help me find Hisashi ABE, Pythago ...
Posted by likesmath
2 messages
11:11 AM, Oct-06-08

triangle construction
Posted by Elianto84
12 messages
07:06 PM, Oct-30-08

Gardner's Torus cutting puzzle... ...
Posted by itineracy
3 messages
11:22 PM, Nov-02-08

Three Concurrent Circles
Posted by billmillar
2 messages
12:26 PM, Oct-28-08

A Particular Triangle
Posted by Bui Quang Tuan
2 messages
09:41 AM, Nov-20-08

Error in Fractal Curves and Dimen ...
Posted by miguemate22
1 messages
08:51 AM, Nov-16-08